Understanding TextField
and BasicTextField
in Jetpack Compose
When and How to Use Them

Introduction
Jetpack Compose, Google’s modern toolkit for building native Android UI, offers a powerful and intuitive way to create user interfaces. Among its many components, TextField
and BasicTextField
are essential for handling text input. However, these two components serve different purposes and are suited for different use cases. In this article, we'll explore the differences between TextField
and BasicTextField
, understand their unique features, and discuss when and how to use each.
What is TextField
?
TextField
is a high-level composable that provides a complete and feature-rich text input field designed to comply with Material Design guidelines. It offers a wide range of built-in functionalities, making it a go-to choice for most text input scenarios.
Key Features of TextField
- Material Design Compliance:
TextField
adheres to Material Design principles, ensuring a consistent look and feel across your app. - Built-in Features: Includes label, placeholder, error message display, and various styling options.
- Ease of Use: Provides a straightforward API for implementing common text input functionalities without much boilerplate code.
Example Usage
TextField(
value = text,
onValueChange = { text = it },
label = { Text("Label") },
placeholder = { Text("Placeholder") },
isError = isError,
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth()
)
What is BasicTextField
?
BasicTextField
, on the other hand, is a lower-level composable that provides the core functionality for text input without any additional decorations or features. It offers a high degree of customization, allowing developers to build highly tailored text input components.
Key Features of BasicTextField
- Customizability: Provides a blank canvas for developers to create custom text input fields with specific styling and behavior.
- Core Functionality: Focuses on the essential aspects of text input, leaving the rest to be handled by the developer.
- Flexibility: Suitable for creating non-standard text input fields that do not conform to typical design guidelines.
Example Usage
BasicTextField(
value = text,
onValueChange = { text = it },
modifier = Modifier
.border(1.dp, Color.Gray)
.padding(8.dp)
.fillMaxWidth()
)
When to Use TextField
Ideal Use Cases
- Standard Text Inputs: When you need a standard text input field with all the typical features and styling.
- Rapid Development: When you want to quickly implement a text input field without worrying about custom styling or behavior.
- Material Design Compliance: When your application needs to adhere strictly to Material Design guidelines.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Easy to use and quick to implement.
- Comes with built-in features that cover most common use cases.
- Ensures consistency with Material Design.
Cons:
- Limited customizability compared to
BasicTextField
. - May include features that are unnecessary for highly specialized use cases.
When to Use BasicTextField
Ideal Use Cases
- Custom Designs: When you need to create a text input field with a unique design that deviates from standard guidelines.
- Complex Behavior: When your text input requires specific behaviors that are not supported by
TextField
. - Minimalist Requirements: When you want to implement a minimalistic text input field without extra features.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Highly customizable to fit any design or behavior requirements.
- Provides a lightweight option for cases where
TextField
's additional features are not needed. - Ideal for building complex, non-standard text input components.
Cons:
- Requires more code and effort to implement.
- Lacks built-in features, so developers must manually handle common functionalities.
Conclusion
Both TextField
and BasicTextField
are powerful tools in Jetpack Compose, each suited for different scenarios. TextField
is perfect for most standard text input needs, offering ease of use and compliance with Material Design. BasicTextField
, meanwhile, shines in situations where custom designs and behaviors are required. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each will help you choose the right component for your specific needs, enabling you to create more effective and appealing Android applications.
References

Dobri Kostadinov
Android Consultant | Trainer
Email me | Follow me on LinkedIn | Follow me on Medium | Buy me a coffee