Jetpack Compose: A Deep Dive into BasicTextField vs BasicTextField2

Exploring the Differences, Use Cases, and Practical Examples for Efficient Text Input Handling

This image was generated with the assistance of AI

Introduction

Jetpack Compose, Android’s modern UI toolkit, is revolutionizing how developers build user interfaces. With its declarative syntax, it simplifies the creation of complex UI elements while allowing developers to manage state in a more intuitive way. Among the many components offered by Jetpack Compose, text input fields are essential for capturing user input. In this article, we’ll explore the differences between BasicTextField and BasicTextField2, two components designed for text input, and provide practical examples to help you choose the right one for your project.

BasicTextField: The Original Text Input Field

BasicTextField is the foundational component for creating text input fields in Jetpack Compose. It provides a blank canvas where developers have full control over the text field's appearance and behavior, making it suitable for custom implementations where you need to build everything from scratch.

Key Features:

• Customizable UI: BasicTextField does not provide any default UI elements like borders, padding, or backgrounds. This gives developers the freedom to design the text field's appearance exactly as they want, but also means more work to achieve a polished UI.
• Flexible Text Handling: Developers have the flexibility to manage how the text is displayed, from handling cursor position and text selection to applying different text styles dynamically.
• Manual State Management: Since BasicTextField doesn’t come with built-in state management, you must manage the text state manually using Compose's state management tools.

Practical Example: Custom Search Bar

Suppose you want to create a custom search bar with a placeholder text, a search icon, and a clear button. You can achieve this using BasicTextField:

@Composable
fun CustomSearchBar() {
    var text by remember { mutableStateOf("") }

    Box(
        modifier = Modifier
            .fillMaxWidth()
            .padding(16.dp)
            .background(Color.LightGray, shape = RoundedCornerShape(8.dp))
            .padding(horizontal = 8.dp, vertical = 12.dp)
    ) {
        if (text.isEmpty()) {
            Text("Search...", color = Color.Gray)
        }

        Row(verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically) {
            Icon(Icons.Default.Search, contentDescription = "Search", tint = Color.Gray)

            Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(8.dp))

            BasicTextField(
                value = text,
                onValueChange = { text = it },
                modifier = Modifier.weight(1f),
                textStyle = TextStyle(color = Color.Black, fontSize = 16.sp)
            )

            if (text.isNotEmpty()) {
                IconButton(onClick = { text = "" }) {
                    Icon(Icons.Default.Close, contentDescription = "Clear", tint = Color.Gray)
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

In this example, BasicTextField is used to handle the core text input functionality, while the surrounding UI elements (such as icons and placeholders) are built around it. This flexibility allows you to create a highly customized text input component.

BasicTextField2: The Newcomer

BasicTextField2 is a newer component introduced to improve upon BasicTextField by simplifying common use cases and optimizing performance. It is designed to handle most typical text input scenarios with less code and fewer manual configurations.

Key Features:

• Improved Performance: BasicTextField2 is optimized for scenarios that involve complex text handling, such as managing large amounts of text or rapidly changing input.
• Simplified Text Handling: It provides better out-of-the-box handling of text composition, cursor movement, and text selection, making it easier to implement robust text input fields.
• Less Boilerplate: The API is designed to reduce the amount of code needed for common tasks, making it quicker to implement text fields in your Compose applications.

Practical Example: Basic Login Form

Consider creating a basic login form where the user enters their email and password. Using BasicTextField2, this can be done with less boilerplate and better performance:

@Composable
fun LoginForm() {
    var email by remember { mutableStateOf("") }
    var password by remember { mutableStateOf("") }

    Column(modifier = Modifier.padding(16.dp)) {
        Text("Email", style = TextStyle(fontSize = 18.sp))
        BasicTextField2(
            value = email,
            onValueChange = { email = it },
            modifier = Modifier
                .fillMaxWidth()
                .padding(vertical = 8.dp)
                .background(Color.LightGray, RoundedCornerShape(4.dp))
                .padding(horizontal = 8.dp, vertical = 12.dp),
            textStyle = TextStyle(color = Color.Black, fontSize = 16.sp)
        )

        Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp))

        Text("Password", style = TextStyle(fontSize = 18.sp))
        BasicTextField2(
            value = password,
            onValueChange = { password = it },
            modifier = Modifier
                .fillMaxWidth()
                .padding(vertical = 8.dp)
                .background(Color.LightGray, RoundedCornerShape(4.dp))
                .padding(horizontal = 8.dp, vertical = 12.dp),
            textStyle = TextStyle(color = Color.Black, fontSize = 16.sp),
            visualTransformation = PasswordVisualTransformation()
        )

        Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp))

        Button(onClick = { /* Handle login */ }, modifier = Modifier.align(Alignment.End)) {
            Text("Login")
        }
    }
}

In this example, BasicTextField2 is used for both email and password fields. The code is concise, and the text input behavior is smooth and efficient, thanks to the optimizations in BasicTextField2.

Key Differences: A Deeper Dive

While both BasicTextField and BasicTextField2 serve similar purposes, they differ significantly in terms of design philosophy and use cases.

Customization vs. Simplicity:

• BasicTextField gives you total control, making it ideal for scenarios where you need to implement highly customized UI components.
• BasicTextField2 provides enough flexibility for most common scenarios with built-in optimizations, reducing the need for manual customizations.

Performance:

• BasicTextField is generally performant, but in complex or large-scale scenarios, it may require additional performance tuning.
• BasicTextField2 is optimized for better performance out-of-the-box, making it suitable for applications with more demanding text input requirements.

API Complexity:

• BasicTextField requires more boilerplate code, which can be advantageous when creating custom components but may be cumbersome for simpler use cases.
• BasicTextField2 streamlines the API, making it easier and faster to implement standard text input fields.

State Management:

• Both BasicTextField and BasicTextField2 require manual state management, but BasicTextField2 simplifies this process by integrating more common behaviors directly into the component.

Advanced Example: Rich Text Editor

Let’s explore a more complex example — a rich text editor that allows users to apply bold, italic, and underline styles to their text. Here, BasicTextField might be more appropriate due to the high level of customization required.

@Composable
fun RichTextEditor() {
    var text by remember { mutableStateOf(AnnotatedString("Edit your text here...")) }
    var isBold by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
    var isItalic by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
    var isUnderline by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }

    Column(modifier = Modifier.padding(16.dp)) {
        Row {
            ToggleButton("B", isBold) { isBold = !isBold }
            ToggleButton("I", isItalic) { isItalic = !isItalic }
            ToggleButton("U", isUnderline) { isUnderline = !isUnderline }
        }

        Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(8.dp))

        BasicTextField(
            value = text,
            onValueChange = { newText ->
                text = AnnotatedString(
                    newText.text,
                    spanStyles = listOf(
                        AnnotatedString.Range(
                            SpanStyle(
                                fontWeight = if (isBold) FontWeight.Bold else FontWeight.Normal,
                                fontStyle = if (isItalic) FontStyle.Italic else FontStyle.Normal,
                                textDecoration = if (isUnderline) TextDecoration.Underline else TextDecoration.None
                            ),
                            start = 0,
                            end = newText.length
                        )
                    )
                )
            },
            modifier = Modifier
                .fillMaxWidth()
                .padding(8.dp)
                .background(Color.White, RoundedCornerShape(4.dp))
                .padding(8.dp),
            textStyle = TextStyle(fontSize = 18.sp)
        )
    }
}

@Composable
fun ToggleButton(text: String, isSelected: Boolean, onClick: () -> Unit) {
    Button(
        onClick = onClick,
        colors = ButtonDefaults.buttonColors(backgroundColor = if (isSelected) Color.Gray else Color.LightGray)
    ) {
        Text(text)
    }
}

In this example, BasicTextField is used because it provides the flexibility needed to apply different text styles based on user input. This level of customization is currently beyond the scope of BasicTextField2.

Conclusion

BasicTextField and BasicTextField2 each have their strengths and ideal use cases in Jetpack Compose. If you need total control over your text input field or are building a complex UI component, BasicTextField is likely the better choice. On the other hand, if you want a more performant and straightforward solution for standard text input scenarios, BasicTextField2 is a great option.

Understanding these differences and choosing the right component based on your application’s requirements can help you build more efficient and maintainable Compose UIs. Whether you’re working on a custom search bar, a basic login form, or a complex rich text editor, Jetpack Compose provides the tools you need to create responsive, dynamic, and beautiful Android applications.

Dobri Kostadinov
Android Consultant | Trainer
Email me | Follow me on LinkedIn | Follow me on Medium | Buy me a coffee